首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of the immunomodulatory properties of three probiotic strains of Lactobacilli using complex culture systems: prediction for in vivo efficacy
【2h】

Comparison of the immunomodulatory properties of three probiotic strains of Lactobacilli using complex culture systems: prediction for in vivo efficacy

机译:使用复杂的培养系统比较三种乳酸菌益生菌菌株的免疫调节特性:体内功效预测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: While the use of probiotics to treat or prevent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been proposed, to this point the clinical benefits have been limited. In this report we analyzed the immunological activity of three strains of Lactobacillus to predict their in vivo efficacy in protecting against experimental colitis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compared the immunological properties of Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB8826, L. rhamnosus GG (LGG), L. paracasei B21060 and pathogenic Salmonella typhimurium (SL1344). We studied the stimulatory effects of these different strains upon dendritic cells (DCs) either directly by co-culture or indirectly via conditioning of an epithelial intermediary. Furthermore, we characterized the effects of these strains in vivo using a Dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) model of colitis. We found that the three strains exhibited different abilities to induce inflammatory cytokine production by DCs with L. plantarum being the most effective followed by LGG and L. paracasei. L. paracasei minimally induced the release of cytokines, while it also inhibited the potential of DCs to both produce inflammatory cytokines (IL-12 and TNF-alpha) and to drive Th1 T cells in response to Salmonella. This effect on DCs was found under both direct and indirect stimulatory conditions - i.e. mediated by epithelial cells - and was dependent upon an as yet unidentified soluble mediator. When tested in vivo, L. plantarum and LGG exacerbated the development of DSS-induced colitis and caused the death of treated mice, while, conversely L. paracasei was protective. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a new property of probiotics to either directly or indirectly inhibit DC activation by inflammatory bacteria. Moreover, some immunostimulatory probiotics not only failed to protect against colitis, they actually amplified the disease progression. In conclusion, caution must be exercised when choosing a probiotic strain to treat IBD.
机译:背景:尽管已提出使用益生菌治疗或预防炎症性肠病(IBD),但到目前为止,其临床益处受到了限制。在本报告中,我们分析了三种乳酸杆菌菌株的免疫活性,以预测它们在体内预防实验性结肠炎的功效。方法/主要发现:我们比较了植物乳杆菌NCIMB8826,鼠李糖乳杆菌GG(LGG),副干酪乳杆菌B21060和致病性鼠伤寒沙门氏菌(SL1344)的免疫学特性。我们研究了这些不同菌株对树突状细胞(DCs)的刺激作用,可直接通过共培养或间接通过调节上皮细胞介导。此外,我们使用结肠炎的葡聚糖硫酸钠(DSS)模型表征了这些菌株在体内的作用。我们发现这三种菌株表现出不同的能力来诱导DC产生炎症性细胞因子,其中植物乳杆菌最有效,其次是LGG和副干酪乳杆菌。副干酪乳杆菌最小程度地诱导了细胞因子的释放,同时还抑制了DCs产生炎性细胞因子(IL-12和TNF-α)并响应沙门氏菌而驱动Th1 T细胞的潜力。在直接和间接刺激条件下(即由上皮细胞介导的)都发现了对DC的这种作用,并且取决于尚未确定的可溶性介体。当在体内进行测试时,植物乳杆菌和LGG加剧了DSS诱导的结肠炎的发展,并导致了治疗小鼠的死亡,而副干酪乳杆菌则具有保护作用。结论:我们描述了益生菌具有直接或间接抑制炎性细菌激活DC的新特性。而且,一些免疫刺激性的益生菌不仅不能预防结肠炎,而且实际上加剧了疾病的进展。总之,选择益生菌菌株治疗IBD时必须谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号